Your warrant seems out of place compared to the rest of your model. The "prevalance of frustration and ambiguity" doesn't really sound like a good link between "uncertainty in your major" and "consideration of your interests." I think it would be better if you split your grounds statements and have the second statement be your warrant; the backing would even support it.
I like your backing and qualifier. It is an important problem and you should "Make the right choice". You might need to work on this model a bit. Your grounds seem more like a claim for me because this part should give the reasons for your claim.
I suggest that you switch your claim and grounds. I like to think of the claim and grounds as being linked by a "because". For example. I claim... because of these grounds...
In your case it might be: I'm not sure of my major because money is not the only important thing in life and I need to take into consideration my interests and other factors when I choose my major.
Your warrant seems out of place compared to the rest of your model. The "prevalance of frustration and ambiguity" doesn't really sound like a good link between "uncertainty in your major" and "consideration of your interests." I think it would be better if you split your grounds statements and have the second statement be your warrant; the backing would even support it.
ReplyDeleteI like your backing and qualifier. It is an important problem and you should "Make the right choice". You might need to work on this model a bit. Your grounds seem more like a claim for me because this part should give the reasons for your claim.
ReplyDeleteI suggest that you switch your claim and grounds. I like to think of the claim and grounds as being linked by a "because". For example. I claim... because of these grounds...
ReplyDeleteIn your case it might be: I'm not sure of my major because money is not the only important thing in life and I need to take into consideration my interests and other factors when I choose my major.